2001 Chevrolet Celta vs. 1968 Ford Fairlane
To start off, 2001 Chevrolet Celta is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Ford Fairlane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Ford Fairlane would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Chevrolet Celta weights approximately 90 kg more than 1968 Ford Fairlane.
Because 1968 Ford Fairlane is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Ford Fairlane. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Chevrolet Celta, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Chevrolet Celta | 1968 Ford Fairlane | |
Make | Chevrolet | Ford |
Model | Celta | Fairlane |
Year Released | 2001 | 1968 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 213 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1675 kg | 1585 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2960 mm |