2001 Chevrolet Celta vs. 1968 Mazda Cosmo
To start off, 2001 Chevrolet Celta is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Mazda Cosmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Mazda Cosmo would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Chevrolet Celta weights approximately 735 kg more than 1968 Mazda Cosmo.
Because 1968 Mazda Cosmo is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Mazda Cosmo. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Chevrolet Celta, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 Chevrolet Celta | 1968 Mazda Cosmo | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Mazda |
| Model | Celta | Cosmo |
| Year Released | 2001 | 1968 |
| Body Type | Convertible | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 94 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1675 kg | 940 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2210 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 71 L | 57 L |
