2001 Chevrolet Celta vs. 1980 Zastava 132
To start off, 2001 Chevrolet Celta is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Zastava 132. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Zastava 132 would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Chevrolet Celta weights approximately 580 kg more than 1980 Zastava 132.
Because 1980 Zastava 132 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1980 Zastava 132. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Chevrolet Celta, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Chevrolet Celta | 1980 Zastava 132 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Zastava |
Model | Celta | 132 |
Year Released | 2001 | 1980 |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 106 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1675 kg | 1095 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2560 mm |