2001 Chevrolet Celta vs. 1997 Ford Falcon
To start off, 2001 Chevrolet Celta is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Ford Falcon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Ford Falcon would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Chevrolet Celta weights approximately 1 kg more than 1997 Ford Falcon.
Because 1997 Ford Falcon is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1997 Ford Falcon. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Chevrolet Celta, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 Chevrolet Celta | 1997 Ford Falcon | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Ford |
| Model | Celta | Falcon |
| Year Released | 2001 | 1997 |
| Body Type | Convertible | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 301 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1675 kg | 1674 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2830 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 71 L | 62 L |
