2001 Chevrolet Celta vs. 2002 Smart ForTwo
To start off, 2002 Smart ForTwo is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Chevrolet Celta. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Chevrolet Celta would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Chevrolet Celta weights approximately 860 kg more than 2002 Smart ForTwo.
Because 2002 Smart ForTwo is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2002 Smart ForTwo. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Chevrolet Celta, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Chevrolet Celta | 2002 Smart ForTwo | |
Make | Chevrolet | Smart |
Model | Celta | ForTwo |
Year Released | 2001 | 2002 |
Body Type | Convertible | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 40 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1675 kg | 815 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 1820 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 71 L | 22 L |