2001 Chevrolet Celta vs. 2006 Mercedes-Benz SL
To start off, 2006 Mercedes-Benz SL is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Chevrolet Celta. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Chevrolet Celta would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Chevrolet Celta weights approximately 240 kg more than 2006 Mercedes-Benz SL.
Because 2006 Mercedes-Benz SL is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Mercedes-Benz SL. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Chevrolet Celta, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2006 Mercedes-Benz SL has automatic transmission and 2001 Chevrolet Celta has manual transmission. 2001 Chevrolet Celta will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2006 Mercedes-Benz SL will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 Chevrolet Celta | 2006 Mercedes-Benz SL | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Mercedes-Benz |
| Model | Celta | SL |
| Year Released | 2001 | 2006 |
| Body Type | Convertible | Convertible |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 302 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1675 kg | 1435 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2570 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 71 L | 80 L |
