2001 Chevrolet Celta vs. 2008 Mercury Sable
To start off, 2008 Mercury Sable is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Chevrolet Celta. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Chevrolet Celta would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Mercury Sable weights approximately 400 kg more than 2001 Chevrolet Celta.
Because 2008 Mercury Sable is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2001 Chevrolet Celta. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Mercury Sable will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2008 Mercury Sable has automatic transmission and 2001 Chevrolet Celta has manual transmission. 2001 Chevrolet Celta will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2008 Mercury Sable will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Chevrolet Celta | 2008 Mercury Sable | |
Make | Chevrolet | Mercury |
Model | Celta | Sable |
Year Released | 2001 | 2008 |
Body Type | Convertible | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 260 HP |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1675 kg | 2075 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2870 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 71 L | 78 L |