2001 Chevrolet Celta vs. 2009 Cadillac BLS
To start off, 2009 Cadillac BLS is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Chevrolet Celta. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Chevrolet Celta would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Chevrolet Celta weights approximately 40 kg more than 2009 Cadillac BLS.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2009 Cadillac BLS has automatic transmission and 2001 Chevrolet Celta has manual transmission. 2001 Chevrolet Celta will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Cadillac BLS will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Chevrolet Celta | 2009 Cadillac BLS | |
Make | Chevrolet | Cadillac |
Model | Celta | BLS |
Year Released | 2001 | 2009 |
Body Type | Convertible | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 148 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1675 kg | 1635 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2680 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 71 L | 58 L |