2001 Chevrolet Celta vs. 2010 Chevrolet Equinox
To start off, 2010 Chevrolet Equinox is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Chevrolet Celta. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Chevrolet Celta would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Chevrolet Equinox weights approximately 35 kg more than 2001 Chevrolet Celta.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2010 Chevrolet Equinox has automatic transmission and 2001 Chevrolet Celta has manual transmission. 2001 Chevrolet Celta will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Chevrolet Equinox will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 Chevrolet Celta | 2010 Chevrolet Equinox | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Chevrolet |
| Model | Celta | Equinox |
| Year Released | 2001 | 2010 |
| Body Type | Convertible | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 182 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1675 kg | 1710 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2858 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 71 L | 71 L |
