2001 Chevrolet Impala vs. 1948 Simca 5
To start off, 2001 Chevrolet Impala is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1948 Simca 5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1948 Simca 5 would be higher. At 3,350 cc (6 cylinders), 2001 Chevrolet Impala is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Chevrolet Impala (180 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 166 more horse power than 1948 Simca 5. (14 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2001 Chevrolet Impala should accelerate faster than 1948 Simca 5. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Chevrolet Impala weights approximately 1018 kg more than 1948 Simca 5. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1948 Simca 5 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1948 Simca 5. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Chevrolet Impala, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 Chevrolet Impala | 1948 Simca 5 | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Simca |
| Model | Impala | 5 |
| Year Released | 2001 | 1948 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3350 cc | 570 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 180 HP | 14 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1578 kg | 560 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5090 mm | 3220 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1280 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1350 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3030 mm | 2010 mm |
