2001 Chevrolet Impala vs. 2007 Ford E-250
To start off, 2007 Ford E-250 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Chevrolet Impala. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Chevrolet Impala would be higher. At 4,606 cc (8 cylinders), 2007 Ford E-250 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Ford E-250 (225 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 45 more horse power than 2001 Chevrolet Impala. (180 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2007 Ford E-250 should accelerate faster than 2001 Chevrolet Impala.
Let's talk about torque, 2007 Ford E-250 (388 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 110 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Chevrolet Impala. (278 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2007 Ford E-250 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Chevrolet Impala.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Chevrolet Impala | 2007 Ford E-250 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Ford |
Model | Impala | E-250 |
Year Released | 2001 | 2007 |
Body Type | Sedan | Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3350 cc | 4606 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 180 HP | 225 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 278 Nm | 388 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5090 mm | 5390 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 2020 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 2120 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3030 mm | 3510 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 7.8 L/100km | 14.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 117 L | 132 L |