2001 Chevrolet Impala vs. 2009 Holden Commodore

To start off, 2009 Holden Commodore is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Chevrolet Impala. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Chevrolet Impala would be higher. At 3,791 cc (6 cylinders), 2001 Chevrolet Impala is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Holden Commodore (240 HP) has 40 more horse power than 2001 Chevrolet Impala. (200 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Holden Commodore should accelerate faster than 2001 Chevrolet Impala.

Because 2009 Holden Commodore is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Holden Commodore. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Chevrolet Impala, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Chevrolet Impala (305 Nm) has 65 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Holden Commodore. (240 Nm). This means 2001 Chevrolet Impala will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Holden Commodore. 2001 Chevrolet Impala has automatic transmission and 2009 Holden Commodore has manual transmission. 2009 Holden Commodore will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2001 Chevrolet Impala will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: