2001 Chevrolet Monte Carlo vs. 1963 DKW Munga
To start off, 2001 Chevrolet Monte Carlo is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 DKW Munga would be higher. At 3,354 cc (6 cylinders), 2001 Chevrolet Monte Carlo is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Chevrolet Monte Carlo weights approximately 405 kg more than 1963 DKW Munga.
Because 1963 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2001 Chevrolet Monte Carlo. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1963 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 Chevrolet Monte Carlo | 1963 DKW Munga | |
| Make | Chevrolet | DKW |
| Model | Monte Carlo | Munga |
| Year Released | 2001 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3354 cc | 980 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 43 HP |
| Engine Bore Size | 92 mm | 76.1 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 84.1 mm | 74 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 8.0:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 1515 kg | 1110 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5030 mm | 3450 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1820 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1760 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2860 mm | 2010 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 31 L |
