2001 Chevrolet Monte Carlo vs. 1964 Oldsmobile Starfire
To start off, 2001 Chevrolet Monte Carlo is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Oldsmobile Starfire. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Oldsmobile Starfire would be higher. At 6,965 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Oldsmobile Starfire is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Oldsmobile Starfire weights approximately 248 kg more than 2001 Chevrolet Monte Carlo.
Because 1964 Oldsmobile Starfire is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Oldsmobile Starfire. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Chevrolet Monte Carlo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 Chevrolet Monte Carlo | 1964 Oldsmobile Starfire | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Oldsmobile |
| Model | Monte Carlo | Starfire |
| Year Released | 2001 | 1964 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3354 cc | 6965 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 180 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1572 kg | 1820 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2810 mm | 3130 mm |
