2001 Chevrolet Monte Carlo vs. 1965 AC Cobra
To start off, 2001 Chevrolet Monte Carlo is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 AC Cobra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 AC Cobra would be higher. At 4,737 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 AC Cobra is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Chevrolet Monte Carlo weights approximately 505 kg more than 1965 AC Cobra.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2001 Chevrolet Monte Carlo has automatic transmission and 1965 AC Cobra has manual transmission. 1965 AC Cobra will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2001 Chevrolet Monte Carlo will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Chevrolet Monte Carlo | 1965 AC Cobra | |
Make | Chevrolet | AC |
Model | Monte Carlo | Cobra |
Year Released | 2001 | 1965 |
Body Type | Coupe | Roadster |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3354 cc | 4737 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 267 HP |
Engine Bore Size | 92 mm | 101.7 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 84.1 mm | 72.9 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 9.0:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1515 kg | 1010 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5030 mm | 3850 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1560 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1250 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2860 mm | 2290 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 68 L |