2001 Chevrolet Monte Carlo vs. 1996 Nissan Cima
To start off, 2001 Chevrolet Monte Carlo is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Nissan Cima. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Nissan Cima would be higher. At 3,354 cc (6 cylinders), 2001 Chevrolet Monte Carlo is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Chevrolet Monte Carlo weights approximately 42 kg more than 1996 Nissan Cima.
Because 1996 Nissan Cima is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1996 Nissan Cima. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Chevrolet Monte Carlo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Chevrolet Monte Carlo | 1996 Nissan Cima | |
Make | Chevrolet | Nissan |
Model | Monte Carlo | Cima |
Year Released | 2001 | 1996 |
Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3354 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 180 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1572 kg | 1530 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5030 mm | 4880 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1770 mm |