2001 Chevrolet Monte Carlo vs. 2010 Mercedes-Benz SL
To start off, 2010 Mercedes-Benz SL is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Chevrolet Monte Carlo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Chevrolet Monte Carlo would be higher. At 3,791 cc (6 cylinders), 2001 Chevrolet Monte Carlo is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2010 Mercedes-Benz SL is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2010 Mercedes-Benz SL. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Chevrolet Monte Carlo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Mercedes-Benz SL (360 Nm @ 4900 RPM) has 55 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Chevrolet Monte Carlo. (305 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2010 Mercedes-Benz SL will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Chevrolet Monte Carlo.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Chevrolet Monte Carlo | 2010 Mercedes-Benz SL | |
Make | Chevrolet | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | Monte Carlo | SL |
Year Released | 2001 | 2010 |
Body Type | Coupe | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3791 cc | 3498 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 311 HP |
Torque | 305 Nm | 360 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4900 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 7-speed shiftable automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5030 mm | 4582 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1298 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2810 mm | 2560 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 80 L |