2001 Chevrolet Monte Carlo vs. 2012 Opel Combo
To start off, 2012 Opel Combo is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Chevrolet Monte Carlo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Chevrolet Monte Carlo would be higher. At 3,354 cc (6 cylinders), 2001 Chevrolet Monte Carlo is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2001 Chevrolet Monte Carlo is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2001 Chevrolet Monte Carlo. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Opel Combo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2001 Chevrolet Monte Carlo has automatic transmission and 2012 Opel Combo has manual transmission. 2012 Opel Combo will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2001 Chevrolet Monte Carlo will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Chevrolet Monte Carlo | 2012 Opel Combo | |
Make | Chevrolet | Opel |
Model | Monte Carlo | Combo |
Year Released | 2001 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3354 cc | 1364 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 89 HP |
Engine Bore Size | 92 mm | 73.4 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 84.1 mm | 80.6 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5030 mm | 4330 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1690 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2860 mm | 2720 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 52 L |