2001 Chevrolet Sabia vs. 1965 Ford Mustang
To start off, 2001 Chevrolet Sabia is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Ford Mustang. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Ford Mustang would be higher. At 4,733 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Chevrolet Sabia weights approximately 433 kg more than 1965 Ford Mustang.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 Chevrolet Sabia | 1965 Ford Mustang | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Ford |
| Model | Sabia | Mustang |
| Year Released | 2001 | 1965 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1998 cc | 4733 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 208 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1598 kg | 1165 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4410 mm | 4620 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1310 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2750 mm |
