2001 Chevrolet Sabia vs. 1965 Steyr Haflinger
To start off, 2001 Chevrolet Sabia is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Steyr Haflinger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Steyr Haflinger would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2001 Chevrolet Sabia is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Chevrolet Sabia weights approximately 998 kg more than 1965 Steyr Haflinger.
Because 1965 Steyr Haflinger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2001 Chevrolet Sabia. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1965 Steyr Haflinger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2001 Chevrolet Sabia has automatic transmission and 1965 Steyr Haflinger has manual transmission. 1965 Steyr Haflinger will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2001 Chevrolet Sabia will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Chevrolet Sabia | 1965 Steyr Haflinger | |
Make | Chevrolet | Steyr |
Model | Sabia | Haflinger |
Year Released | 2001 | 1965 |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 643 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 24 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1598 kg | 600 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4410 mm | 2840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1750 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 1510 mm |