2001 Chevrolet Sabia vs. 2000 Mercedes-Benz SL
To start off, 2001 Chevrolet Sabia is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Mercedes-Benz SL. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Mercedes-Benz SL would be higher. At 4,966 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Mercedes-Benz SL is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Mercedes-Benz SL weights approximately 217 kg more than 2001 Chevrolet Sabia.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2001 Chevrolet Sabia has automatic transmission and 2000 Mercedes-Benz SL has manual transmission. 2000 Mercedes-Benz SL will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2001 Chevrolet Sabia will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Chevrolet Sabia | 2000 Mercedes-Benz SL | |
Make | Chevrolet | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | Sabia | SL |
Year Released | 2001 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 4966 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 302 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1598 kg | 1815 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4410 mm | 4470 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1300 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2520 mm |