2001 Chevrolet Sabia vs. 2003 MCC ForFour
To start off, 2003 MCC ForFour is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Chevrolet Sabia. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Chevrolet Sabia would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2001 Chevrolet Sabia is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Chevrolet Sabia weights approximately 628 kg more than 2003 MCC ForFour.
Because 2001 Chevrolet Sabia is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2001 Chevrolet Sabia. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 MCC ForFour, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2001 Chevrolet Sabia has automatic transmission and 2003 MCC ForFour has manual transmission. 2003 MCC ForFour will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2001 Chevrolet Sabia will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Chevrolet Sabia | 2003 MCC ForFour | |
Make | Chevrolet | MCC |
Model | Sabia | ForFour |
Year Released | 2001 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 1331 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 93 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1598 kg | 970 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4410 mm | 3760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2510 mm |