2001 Chevrolet Sabia vs. 2010 Cadillac BLS
To start off, 2010 Cadillac BLS is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Chevrolet Sabia. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Chevrolet Sabia would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2001 Chevrolet Sabia is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Cadillac BLS weights approximately 37 kg more than 2001 Chevrolet Sabia.
Because 2001 Chevrolet Sabia is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2001 Chevrolet Sabia. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Cadillac BLS, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Chevrolet Sabia | 2010 Cadillac BLS | |
Make | Chevrolet | Cadillac |
Model | Sabia | BLS |
Year Released | 2001 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 1910 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 148 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1598 kg | 1635 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4410 mm | 4690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1480 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2680 mm |