2001 Chevrolet Sabia vs. 2010 Holden UTE
To start off, 2010 Holden UTE is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Chevrolet Sabia. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Chevrolet Sabia would be higher. At 6,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Holden UTE is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2001 Chevrolet Sabia has automatic transmission and 2010 Holden UTE has manual transmission. 2010 Holden UTE will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2001 Chevrolet Sabia will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 Chevrolet Sabia | 2010 Holden UTE | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Holden |
| Model | Sabia | UTE |
| Year Released | 2001 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1998 cc | 6000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 357 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
