2001 Chevrolet Sabia vs. 2012 Ford Kuga
To start off, 2012 Ford Kuga is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Chevrolet Sabia. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Chevrolet Sabia would be higher. At 2,500 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Ford Kuga is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2012 Ford Kuga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2001 Chevrolet Sabia. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Ford Kuga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2001 Chevrolet Sabia has automatic transmission and 2012 Ford Kuga has manual transmission. 2012 Ford Kuga will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2001 Chevrolet Sabia will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Chevrolet Sabia | 2012 Ford Kuga | |
Make | Chevrolet | Ford |
Model | Sabia | Kuga |
Year Released | 2001 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 2500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 197 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4410 mm | 4450 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1720 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2700 mm |