2001 Chevrolet Sabia vs. 2012 Mazda 6
To start off, 2012 Mazda 6 is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Chevrolet Sabia. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Chevrolet Sabia would be higher. At 2,183 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Chevrolet Sabia weights approximately 48 kg more than 2012 Mazda 6.
Because 2001 Chevrolet Sabia is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2001 Chevrolet Sabia. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Mazda 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 Chevrolet Sabia | 2012 Mazda 6 | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Mazda |
| Model | Sabia | 6 |
| Year Released | 2001 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1998 cc | 2183 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 127 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | 5-speed shiftable automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 1598 kg | 1550 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4410 mm | 4755 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1440 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2789 mm |
