2001 Chevrolet Tracker vs. 1952 Riley RM A
To start off, 2001 Chevrolet Tracker is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Riley RM A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Riley RM A would be higher. At 2,499 cc (6 cylinders), 2001 Chevrolet Tracker is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Chevrolet Tracker weights approximately 305 kg more than 1952 Riley RM A.
Because 2001 Chevrolet Tracker is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1952 Riley RM A. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Chevrolet Tracker will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 Chevrolet Tracker | 1952 Riley RM A | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Riley |
| Model | Tracker | RM A |
| Year Released | 2001 | 1952 |
| Engine Size | 2499 cc | 1496 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1540 kg | 1235 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 4560 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1620 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1700 mm | 1550 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2870 mm |
