2001 Chevrolet Tracker vs. 1958 Rover P4
To start off, 2001 Chevrolet Tracker is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Rover P4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Rover P4 would be higher. At 1,995 cc (4 cylinders), 1958 Rover P4 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Chevrolet Tracker (97 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 46 more horse power than 1958 Rover P4. (51 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2001 Chevrolet Tracker should accelerate faster than 1958 Rover P4.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Chevrolet Tracker (139 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 1 more torque (in Nm) than 1958 Rover P4. (138 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2001 Chevrolet Tracker will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1958 Rover P4.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Chevrolet Tracker | 1958 Rover P4 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Rover |
Model | Tracker | P4 |
Year Released | 2001 | 1958 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1590 cc | 1995 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 97 HP | 51 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 139 Nm | 138 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 4550 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1680 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1700 mm | 1620 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2830 mm |