2001 Chevrolet Tracker vs. 1962 Lotus Elan
To start off, 2001 Chevrolet Tracker is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Lotus Elan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Lotus Elan would be higher. At 2,499 cc (6 cylinders), 2001 Chevrolet Tracker is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Chevrolet Tracker weights approximately 950 kg more than 1962 Lotus Elan.
Because 2001 Chevrolet Tracker is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1962 Lotus Elan. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Chevrolet Tracker will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Chevrolet Tracker (217 Nm) has 79 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Lotus Elan. (138 Nm). This means 2001 Chevrolet Tracker will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Lotus Elan.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 Chevrolet Tracker | 1962 Lotus Elan | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Lotus |
| Model | Tracker | Elan |
| Year Released | 2001 | 1962 |
| Body Type | SUV | Convertible |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2499 cc | 1496 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 100 HP |
| Torque | 217 Nm | 138 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1540 kg | 590 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 3700 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1430 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1700 mm | 1110 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2140 mm |
