2001 Chevrolet Tracker vs. 1963 MG MGB
To start off, 2001 Chevrolet Tracker is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 MG MGB. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 MG MGB would be higher. At 2,499 cc (6 cylinders), 2001 Chevrolet Tracker is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Chevrolet Tracker weights approximately 640 kg more than 1963 MG MGB.
Because 2001 Chevrolet Tracker is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 MG MGB. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Chevrolet Tracker will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Chevrolet Tracker (217 Nm) has 68 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 MG MGB. (149 Nm). This means 2001 Chevrolet Tracker will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 MG MGB.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Chevrolet Tracker | 1963 MG MGB | |
Make | Chevrolet | MG |
Model | Tracker | MGB |
Year Released | 2001 | 1963 |
Body Type | SUV | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2499 cc | 1798 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 89 HP |
Torque | 217 Nm | 149 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1540 kg | 900 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 3900 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1530 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1700 mm | 1260 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2320 mm |