2001 Chevrolet Tracker vs. 1963 Opel Rekord
To start off, 2001 Chevrolet Tracker is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Opel Rekord. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Opel Rekord would be higher. At 2,499 cc (6 cylinders), 2001 Chevrolet Tracker is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Chevrolet Tracker weights approximately 570 kg more than 1963 Opel Rekord.
Because 2001 Chevrolet Tracker is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 Opel Rekord. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Chevrolet Tracker will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Chevrolet Tracker (217 Nm) has 109 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Opel Rekord. (108 Nm). This means 2001 Chevrolet Tracker will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Opel Rekord.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Chevrolet Tracker | 1963 Opel Rekord | |
Make | Chevrolet | Opel |
Model | Tracker | Rekord |
Year Released | 2001 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2499 cc | 1487 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 53 HP |
Torque | 217 Nm | 108 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1540 kg | 970 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 4520 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1700 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2650 mm |