2001 Chevrolet Tracker vs. 1964 Seat 600
To start off, 2001 Chevrolet Tracker is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Seat 600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Seat 600 would be higher. At 1,590 cc (4 cylinders), 2001 Chevrolet Tracker is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Chevrolet Tracker (97 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 73 more horse power than 1964 Seat 600. (24 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2001 Chevrolet Tracker should accelerate faster than 1964 Seat 600.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Chevrolet Tracker (139 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 92 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Seat 600. (47 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2001 Chevrolet Tracker will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Seat 600.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 Chevrolet Tracker | 1964 Seat 600 | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Seat |
| Model | Tracker | 600 |
| Year Released | 2001 | 1964 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 1590 cc | 767 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 97 HP | 24 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 4600 RPM |
| Torque | 139 Nm | 47 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 3300 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1390 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1700 mm | 1360 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2010 mm |
