2001 Chevrolet Tracker vs. 1966 Ford GT 40
To start off, 2001 Chevrolet Tracker is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Ford GT 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Ford GT 40 would be higher. At 4,195 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 Ford GT 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Chevrolet Tracker weights approximately 404 kg more than 1966 Ford GT 40.
Because 2001 Chevrolet Tracker is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 Ford GT 40. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Chevrolet Tracker will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Chevrolet Tracker (217 Nm) has 132 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Ford GT 40. (85 Nm). This means 2001 Chevrolet Tracker will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Ford GT 40.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 Chevrolet Tracker | 1966 Ford GT 40 | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Ford |
| Model | Tracker | GT 40 |
| Year Released | 2001 | 1966 |
| Body Type | SUV | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 2499 cc | 4195 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 350 HP |
| Torque | 217 Nm | 85 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1540 kg | 1136 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 4150 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1780 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1700 mm | 1040 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2420 mm |
