2001 Chevrolet Tracker vs. 1974 Honda 1300
To start off, 2001 Chevrolet Tracker is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Honda 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Honda 1300 would be higher. At 1,590 cc (4 cylinders), 2001 Chevrolet Tracker is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Chevrolet Tracker (97 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 16 more horse power than 1974 Honda 1300. (81 HP @ 7000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2001 Chevrolet Tracker should accelerate faster than 1974 Honda 1300.
Because 2001 Chevrolet Tracker is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2001 Chevrolet Tracker. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1974 Honda 1300, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Chevrolet Tracker (139 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 34 more torque (in Nm) than 1974 Honda 1300. (105 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2001 Chevrolet Tracker will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1974 Honda 1300.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Chevrolet Tracker | 1974 Honda 1300 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Honda |
Model | Tracker | 1300 |
Year Released | 2001 | 1974 |
Body Type | SUV | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1590 cc | 1298 cc |
Horse Power | 97 HP | 81 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 7000 RPM |
Torque | 139 Nm | 105 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 4170 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1510 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1700 mm | 1330 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2200 mm |