2001 Chevrolet Tracker vs. 1976 Mazda RX-2
To start off, 2001 Chevrolet Tracker is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Mazda RX-2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Mazda RX-2 would be higher. At 2,499 cc (6 cylinders), 2001 Chevrolet Tracker is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Chevrolet Tracker weights approximately 580 kg more than 1976 Mazda RX-2.
Because 2001 Chevrolet Tracker is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1976 Mazda RX-2. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Chevrolet Tracker will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Chevrolet Tracker (217 Nm) has 60 more torque (in Nm) than 1976 Mazda RX-2. (157 Nm). This means 2001 Chevrolet Tracker will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1976 Mazda RX-2.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 Chevrolet Tracker | 1976 Mazda RX-2 | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Mazda |
| Model | Tracker | RX-2 |
| Year Released | 2001 | 1976 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2499 cc | 2292 cc |
| Engine Type | V | dual-disk rotary |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 118 HP |
| Torque | 217 Nm | 157 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1540 kg | 960 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 4160 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1590 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1700 mm | 1400 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2480 mm |
