2001 Chevrolet Tracker vs. 1980 Suzuki LJ 50
To start off, 2001 Chevrolet Tracker is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Suzuki LJ 50. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Suzuki LJ 50 would be higher. At 2,499 cc (6 cylinders), 2001 Chevrolet Tracker is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Chevrolet Tracker weights approximately 800 kg more than 1980 Suzuki LJ 50.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Chevrolet Tracker (217 Nm) has 165 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Suzuki LJ 50. (52 Nm). This means 2001 Chevrolet Tracker will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Suzuki LJ 50.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 Chevrolet Tracker | 1980 Suzuki LJ 50 | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Suzuki |
| Model | Tracker | LJ 50 |
| Year Released | 2001 | 1980 |
| Engine Size | 2499 cc | 537 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 26 HP |
| Torque | 217 Nm | 52 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1540 kg | 740 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 3280 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1420 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1700 mm | 1690 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 1940 mm |
