2001 Chevrolet Tracker vs. 1982 Ford Monarch
To start off, 2001 Chevrolet Tracker is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Ford Monarch. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Ford Monarch would be higher. At 4,122 cc (6 cylinders), 1982 Ford Monarch is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Chevrolet Tracker weights approximately 80 kg more than 1982 Ford Monarch.
Because 2001 Chevrolet Tracker is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Ford Monarch. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Chevrolet Tracker will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1982 Ford Monarch has automatic transmission and 2001 Chevrolet Tracker has manual transmission. 2001 Chevrolet Tracker will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1982 Ford Monarch will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 Chevrolet Tracker | 1982 Ford Monarch | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Ford |
| Model | Tracker | Monarch |
| Year Released | 2001 | 1982 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2499 cc | 4122 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 1540 kg | 1460 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 5030 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1900 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1700 mm | 1360 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2800 mm |
