2001 Chevrolet Tracker vs. 1989 Ford RS 200
To start off, 2001 Chevrolet Tracker is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Ford RS 200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Ford RS 200 would be higher. At 2,499 cc (6 cylinders), 2001 Chevrolet Tracker is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Chevrolet Tracker weights approximately 358 kg more than 1989 Ford RS 200.
Because 2001 Chevrolet Tracker is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1989 Ford RS 200. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Chevrolet Tracker will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1989 Ford RS 200 (292 Nm) has 75 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Chevrolet Tracker. (217 Nm). This means 1989 Ford RS 200 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Chevrolet Tracker.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Chevrolet Tracker | 1989 Ford RS 200 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Ford |
Model | Tracker | RS 200 |
Year Released | 2001 | 1989 |
Body Type | SUV | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 2499 cc | 1804 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 247 HP |
Torque | 217 Nm | 292 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1540 kg | 1182 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 4000 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1700 mm | 1330 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2410 mm |