2001 Chevrolet Tracker vs. 1992 Dodge Grand Caravan
To start off, 2001 Chevrolet Tracker is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Dodge Grand Caravan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Dodge Grand Caravan would be higher. At 2,971 cc (6 cylinders), 1992 Dodge Grand Caravan is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1992 Dodge Grand Caravan weights approximately 35 kg more than 2001 Chevrolet Tracker.
Because 2001 Chevrolet Tracker is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1992 Dodge Grand Caravan. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Chevrolet Tracker will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1992 Dodge Grand Caravan (235 Nm) has 18 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Chevrolet Tracker. (217 Nm). This means 1992 Dodge Grand Caravan will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Chevrolet Tracker.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 Chevrolet Tracker | 1992 Dodge Grand Caravan | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Dodge |
| Model | Tracker | Grand Caravan |
| Year Released | 2001 | 1992 |
| Body Type | SUV | Minivan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2499 cc | 2971 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 142 HP |
| Torque | 217 Nm | 235 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1540 kg | 1575 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 4890 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1840 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1700 mm | 1650 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 3040 mm |
