2001 Chevrolet Tracker vs. 1995 Mazda RX-01
To start off, 2001 Chevrolet Tracker is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Mazda RX-01. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Mazda RX-01 would be higher. At 2,614 cc, 1995 Mazda RX-01 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Mazda RX-01 (220 HP) has 93 more horse power than 2001 Chevrolet Tracker. (127 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1995 Mazda RX-01 should accelerate faster than 2001 Chevrolet Tracker. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Chevrolet Tracker weights approximately 87 kg more than 1995 Mazda RX-01.
Because 2001 Chevrolet Tracker is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1995 Mazda RX-01. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Chevrolet Tracker will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1995 Mazda RX-01 (216 Nm) has 33 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Chevrolet Tracker. (183 Nm). This means 1995 Mazda RX-01 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Chevrolet Tracker.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 Chevrolet Tracker | 1995 Mazda RX-01 | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Mazda |
| Model | Tracker | RX-01 |
| Year Released | 2001 | 1995 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1999 cc | 2614 cc |
| Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
| Horse Power | 127 HP | 220 HP |
| Torque | 183 Nm | 216 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1187 kg | 1100 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4140 mm | 4060 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1740 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1690 mm | 1250 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2490 mm | 2350 mm |
