2001 Chevrolet Tracker vs. 1995 Mazda RX-01
To start off, 2001 Chevrolet Tracker is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Mazda RX-01. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Mazda RX-01 would be higher. At 2,614 cc, 1995 Mazda RX-01 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Mazda RX-01 (220 HP @ 8500 RPM) has 123 more horse power than 2001 Chevrolet Tracker. (97 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1995 Mazda RX-01 should accelerate faster than 2001 Chevrolet Tracker.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1995 Mazda RX-01 (216 Nm @ 6000 RPM) has 77 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Chevrolet Tracker. (139 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1995 Mazda RX-01 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Chevrolet Tracker.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Chevrolet Tracker | 1995 Mazda RX-01 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Mazda |
Model | Tracker | RX-01 |
Year Released | 2001 | 1995 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1590 cc | 2614 cc |
Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 97 HP | 220 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 8500 RPM |
Torque | 139 Nm | 216 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 4060 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1740 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1700 mm | 1250 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2350 mm |