2001 Chevrolet Tracker vs. 1996 Volvo V40
To start off, 2001 Chevrolet Tracker is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Volvo V40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Volvo V40 would be higher. At 1,999 cc (4 cylinders), 2001 Chevrolet Tracker is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Chevrolet Tracker (127 HP) has 12 more horse power than 1996 Volvo V40. (115 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2001 Chevrolet Tracker should accelerate faster than 1996 Volvo V40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Volvo V40 weights approximately 43 kg more than 2001 Chevrolet Tracker.
Because 2001 Chevrolet Tracker is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1996 Volvo V40. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Chevrolet Tracker will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Chevrolet Tracker (183 Nm) has 19 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Volvo V40. (164 Nm). This means 2001 Chevrolet Tracker will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Volvo V40.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Chevrolet Tracker | 1996 Volvo V40 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Volvo |
Model | Tracker | V40 |
Year Released | 2001 | 1996 |
Body Type | SUV | Station Wagon |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1999 cc | 1731 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 127 HP | 115 HP |
Torque | 183 Nm | 164 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1187 kg | 1230 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4140 mm | 4490 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1690 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2490 mm | 2570 mm |