2001 Chevrolet Tracker vs. 1997 Renault Helem
To start off, 2001 Chevrolet Tracker is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Renault Helem. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Renault Helem would be higher. At 2,975 cc (6 cylinders), 1997 Renault Helem is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Renault Helem (510 HP) has 413 more horse power than 2001 Chevrolet Tracker. (97 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1997 Renault Helem should accelerate faster than 2001 Chevrolet Tracker.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Chevrolet Tracker (139 Nm) has 54 more torque (in Nm) than 1997 Renault Helem. (85 Nm). This means 2001 Chevrolet Tracker will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1997 Renault Helem.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 Chevrolet Tracker | 1997 Renault Helem | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Renault |
| Model | Tracker | Helem |
| Year Released | 2001 | 1997 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 1590 cc | 2975 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 97 HP | 510 HP |
| Torque | 139 Nm | 85 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2680 mm |
