2001 Chevrolet Tracker vs. 1998 Panoz Q9
To start off, 2001 Chevrolet Tracker is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Panoz Q9. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Panoz Q9 would be higher. At 6,000 cc (8 cylinders), 1998 Panoz Q9 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2001 Chevrolet Tracker is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1998 Panoz Q9. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Chevrolet Tracker will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1998 Panoz Q9 (678 Nm) has 495 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Chevrolet Tracker. (183 Nm). This means 1998 Panoz Q9 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Chevrolet Tracker. 1998 Panoz Q9 has automatic transmission and 2001 Chevrolet Tracker has manual transmission. 2001 Chevrolet Tracker will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1998 Panoz Q9 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Chevrolet Tracker | 1998 Panoz Q9 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Panoz |
Model | Tracker | Q9 |
Year Released | 2001 | 1998 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 1999 cc | 6000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 127 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 183 Nm | 678 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Wheelbase Size | 2490 mm | 2650 mm |