2001 Chevrolet Tracker vs. 2000 Fiat Siena
To start off, 2001 Chevrolet Tracker is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Fiat Siena. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Fiat Siena would be higher. At 1,910 cc, 2000 Fiat Siena is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Chevrolet Tracker (97 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 46 more horse power than 2000 Fiat Siena. (51 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2001 Chevrolet Tracker should accelerate faster than 2000 Fiat Siena.
Because 2001 Chevrolet Tracker is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2001 Chevrolet Tracker. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Fiat Siena, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Fiat Siena (200 Nm) has 61 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Chevrolet Tracker. (139 Nm). This means 2000 Fiat Siena will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Chevrolet Tracker.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Chevrolet Tracker | 2000 Fiat Siena | |
Make | Chevrolet | Fiat |
Model | Tracker | Siena |
Year Released | 2001 | 2000 |
Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1590 cc | 1910 cc |
Horse Power | 97 HP | 51 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 139 Nm | 200 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |