2001 Chevrolet Tracker vs. 2000 Lotus Extreme
To start off, 2001 Chevrolet Tracker is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Lotus Extreme. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Lotus Extreme would be higher. At 1,999 cc (4 cylinders), 2001 Chevrolet Tracker is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Chevrolet Tracker (127 HP) has 7 more horse power than 2000 Lotus Extreme. (120 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2001 Chevrolet Tracker should accelerate faster than 2000 Lotus Extreme. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Chevrolet Tracker weights approximately 731 kg more than 2000 Lotus Extreme. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2001 Chevrolet Tracker is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Lotus Extreme. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Chevrolet Tracker will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Chevrolet Tracker (183 Nm) has 3 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Lotus Extreme. (180 Nm). This means 2001 Chevrolet Tracker will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Lotus Extreme.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Chevrolet Tracker | 2000 Lotus Extreme | |
Make | Chevrolet | Lotus |
Model | Tracker | Extreme |
Year Released | 2001 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1999 cc | 700 cc |
Horse Power | 127 HP | 120 HP |
Torque | 183 Nm | 180 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1187 kg | 456 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4140 mm | 3510 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1810 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2490 mm | 2420 mm |