2001 Chevrolet Tracker vs. 2000 Oldsmobile Aurora
To start off, 2001 Chevrolet Tracker is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Oldsmobile Aurora. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Oldsmobile Aurora would be higher. At 3,473 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Oldsmobile Aurora is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2001 Chevrolet Tracker is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2001 Chevrolet Tracker. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Oldsmobile Aurora, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2000 Oldsmobile Aurora has automatic transmission and 2001 Chevrolet Tracker has manual transmission. 2001 Chevrolet Tracker will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Oldsmobile Aurora will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Chevrolet Tracker | 2000 Oldsmobile Aurora | |
Make | Chevrolet | Oldsmobile |
Model | Tracker | Aurora |
Year Released | 2001 | 2000 |
Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1590 cc | 3473 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 97 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 5230 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1900 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1700 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2900 mm |