2001 Chevrolet Tracker vs. 2002 Ford Ka
To start off, 2002 Ford Ka is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Chevrolet Tracker. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Chevrolet Tracker would be higher. At 1,999 cc (4 cylinders), 2001 Chevrolet Tracker is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Ford Ka (135 HP) has 8 more horse power than 2001 Chevrolet Tracker. (127 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Ford Ka should accelerate faster than 2001 Chevrolet Tracker. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Chevrolet Tracker weights approximately 51 kg more than 2002 Ford Ka.
Because 2001 Chevrolet Tracker is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2002 Ford Ka. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Chevrolet Tracker will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Chevrolet Tracker (183 Nm) has 8 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Ford Ka. (175 Nm). This means 2001 Chevrolet Tracker will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Ford Ka.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Chevrolet Tracker | 2002 Ford Ka | |
Make | Chevrolet | Ford |
Model | Tracker | Ka |
Year Released | 2001 | 2002 |
Body Type | SUV | Roadster |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1999 cc | 1596 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 127 HP | 135 HP |
Torque | 183 Nm | 175 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1187 kg | 1136 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4140 mm | 3660 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1690 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2490 mm | 2450 mm |