2001 Chevrolet Tracker vs. 2002 MG ZT-T
To start off, 2002 MG ZT-T is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Chevrolet Tracker. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Chevrolet Tracker would be higher. At 2,499 cc (6 cylinders), 2001 Chevrolet Tracker is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 MG ZT-T weights approximately 85 kg more than 2001 Chevrolet Tracker.
Because 2001 Chevrolet Tracker is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2002 MG ZT-T. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Chevrolet Tracker will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 MG ZT-T (250 Nm) has 33 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Chevrolet Tracker. (217 Nm). This means 2002 MG ZT-T will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Chevrolet Tracker.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 Chevrolet Tracker | 2002 MG ZT-T | |
| Make | Chevrolet | MG |
| Model | Tracker | ZT-T |
| Year Released | 2001 | 2002 |
| Body Type | SUV | Station Wagon |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2499 cc | 2497 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 187 HP |
| Torque | 217 Nm | 250 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1540 kg | 1625 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 4800 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1780 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1700 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2830 mm |
