2001 Chevrolet Tracker vs. 2002 Rover 75
To start off, 2002 Rover 75 is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Chevrolet Tracker. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Chevrolet Tracker would be higher. At 1,999 cc (4 cylinders), 2001 Chevrolet Tracker is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Chevrolet Tracker (127 HP) has 9 more horse power than 2002 Rover 75. (118 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2001 Chevrolet Tracker should accelerate faster than 2002 Rover 75. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Rover 75 weights approximately 205 kg more than 2001 Chevrolet Tracker.
Because 2001 Chevrolet Tracker is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2002 Rover 75. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Chevrolet Tracker will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Chevrolet Tracker (183 Nm) has 23 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Rover 75. (160 Nm). This means 2001 Chevrolet Tracker will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Rover 75.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Chevrolet Tracker | 2002 Rover 75 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Rover |
Model | Tracker | 75 |
Year Released | 2001 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1999 cc | 1796 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 127 HP | 118 HP |
Torque | 183 Nm | 160 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1187 kg | 1392 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4140 mm | 4760 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1690 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2490 mm | 2750 mm |